Agree or Disagree: Restaurants banning “distracting children” from their establishments


Agree or Disagree: Restaurants banning “distracting children” from their establishments.

This is an article about a restaurant called the Old Fisherman’s Grotto in Monterey California.

They have decided to ban crying children.  They have also let customers know that they don’t welcome strollers, high chairs and booster chairs. 

You might have reacted negatively, but the restaurant says their business has grown. As well, according to the article,other restaurants are taking the same policy.

What do you think of this?

Agree or Disagree: You would support a privatized Public Transit system


image

I have just returned from a week from Toronto.

I saw lots of different things. The Toronto Blue Jays, The Toronto FC, The Hockey Hall of Fame, Wayne Gretzky’s and more! I ate lots of different foods as well. Overall, a good trip.

i had two main ways of transportation. One was walking. The other was Transit. Quite frankly, I was surprised at how slow it was. There are buses and subways, but it takes a long time to get anywhere. It’s not only slow, it’s expensive. If you live in a suburb like Burlington or Hamilton and you want to transfer into Toronto, you would use the GO service. You have to pay to use the GO Service AND you have to pay to use the TTC.

In the current Mayoral election in Toronto, public transit is a major issue. Everyone has different ideas. One idea that even came up during the Ontario Provincial Election has been privatizing the transit system.  It’s something that happens in some places in the States and around the world.

One of The Pro’s-It creates competition which will naturally provide better service.

One of the Con’s-It can cause confusion for riders. Companies would not necessarily provide their competitors transit information.

What are your thoughts? Would you support a privatized Public Transit System?

 

What was Ford Fest really like and why are the Ford’s so popular?


image image image image imageSome of you might be aware, but I’m in Toronto. The reason I decided to come to Toronto was because of this Mayoral Election. I am fascinated by this Mayor race. Here is the biggest city in Canada, Toronto, with the most polarizing and possibly embarrassing Mayor in the world. At least, that’s the perception anyway.

I’m coming at this not from a specific side. Yes, I have a picture with Doug Ford. But, remember, I’m from Calgary. Meeting Doug or Rob Ford is a one of those once in a life time opportunities.

I am coming at this as an observer. An observer of the candidates, their policies and who would be the best Mayor for Toronto.

So, for this one, we are specifically going to focus in Ford Fest. The reason is this event was so controversial going into today. As well as what happened at the event.

First, some background. This us the 19th annual Ford Fest. This used to be an event they held in the Ford Family backyard. However, the event became so popular, that the now use a park in Scarborough. It averages between 10,000-15,000 people a year now.

The big controversy going into today about this event was that it was a subtle…..check that…. not so subtle way to campaign. There is a bylaw in Toronto that says election literature cannot be handed out in city or public.City Councillors and the other Mayor Candidates were insistent that the bylaw officers were watching that this would not happen.

However, this did not stop two Mayoral candidates from attempting to crash the festivities.

First,it was Karen Stintz. She walked into Ford Fest with someone with her campaign team wearing a “Karen Stintz for Mayor” T-Shirt. There were reports she was booed by the crowd. I didn’t see that. When she was asked by a member of the media about if the t-shirt infringes on the rules, her answer was,

“It’s just a t-shirt”.

Second was Sarah Thomson. She came in on a white horse,her campaign team wearing “Sarah Thomson for Mayor T-Shirts”

When she was asked by the media about this her answer was,

“No candidate wants to engage Ford head on. I like circuses. If Ford wants a circus, I’ll give him a circus.”

She was also booed. As well as told by a bylaw officer to leave.

Next was a group called #queeruption. There is a dispute of how many showed up, but there were confrontations between them and Ford Nation Supporters. There were reports of comments of “It’s Adam and Eve,not Adam and Steve”

There is also a picture of a man choking a #queeruption member.

These incidents certainly didn’t dampen the festivities.The park was filled with long lineups. Lineups for actual tickets to get food. Lineups for food.Lineups for Ice Cream. And of course,the lineup for the Fords.

I was walking around when suddenly, there was a loud shout!

“Four more years, Four more years, Four more years!”

It was Doug Ford.

Now, it was not easy to get that picture of that picture. He was surrounded with many people that wanted to get a picture with him. It wasn’t aggressive, but people were assertive. There was lots of people, but I have to day Doug was very patient with everyone. Yes, I know it’s an election year and he has too. But it’s worth saying that. He was dealing with both crowds and reporters at the same time.

Next, I tried to get a photo of Rob Ford. It was tough even to see Rob Ford, let alone take a picture. From what I saw, he looked happy. Certainly, the crowd was happy to see him.

Speaking of the crowd, there was a lot of conversation on Twitter about the crowd.I saw words like scumbag, unintelligent, homophobic, and embarrassing for Toronto.
The crowd I saw was peaceful. Other then the excitement of seeing the Fords, the crowd was listening to music, patiently waiting in lines, and having polite conversations. It was a diverse crowd. Lots of families. Lots of seniors. Some younger people. I would say it seems like more of a traditional crowd.Were they all Ford Nation supporters? Probably not. There were onlookers and some there for a burger. But they were not rowdy or out of control at all.

I also had the opportunity to speak to some people about the campaign. There was one non-supporter of the Fords She had a sign calling out the “Ford Gravy Train” as she called it.

Her point was that, yes Ford Fest was not a “campaign”. And the Fords are claiming they are footing the bill for this. But are they? Are they using campaign donations as they are claiming, or is this a taxpayer expense? This also happened in 2010.

What she also said is although the candidates are better than the campaign of 2010, there is no one that she felt was really an option.

I also spoke to a couple of Ford supporters. One had a Ford for Mayor sign. I said to him, I’m from out of town and I’m curious why.

He pointed out that under the previous administration, his property taxes went up total of 15 % over 4 years. Being a senior, he simply cannot afford that. He has health problems and a tax increase simply something he cannot handle.

It’s important to note as well, he said he loves the NDP. However, he has serious concerns about Olivia Chow’s economic policy.

He also pointed out that in spite of his vote for Ford in 2010, because as he pointed out” council didn’t want him”, they basically removed him from office. So, he asked what happens if he votes for Ford and Council won’t work with him?

He also shared with me a story about City Council. The neighbourhood he lives in is a seniors neighbourhood. He called the city to get the street cleaned.It couldn’t happen because “they could not afford it”.

“But yet they could have a $12,000 party?” He asked.

The Council comment was echoed by someone filming a documentary on the election.

“When Ford was Councillor, he would respond to concerns. No other Councillors did.

As far as his past indiscretions and issues, like using drugs and reports of crime involvement, there two responses from supporters were,

“We all have skeletons in our closet”

and

“What he does in his personal time is his personal time”

It seems that people love Ford’s just one of us approach. He goes to as many openings and events as possible. Time or travel so not an issue. He just does it.

Two things struck me observing this event If you remove the political perspective and personal issues of the Fords, it is impressive how well they engage the city. Think about it. This is an event that started in a back yard is now in a park closely observed, and crashed by opponents. Like them or not, they are doing something right.

The second thing that struck me is my Rob Ford news feed. While I see lots of anti-Rob Ford online, I find it quite interesting that there isn’t one candidate that has caught the imagination of the voter. This is proven by the current three way tie between Ford, Olivia Chow and John Tory.

Heading back home, I heard lots of feedback about the lack of organization of the event. They ran out of food and ice cream. It was not clear which line up was for tickets, food, or ice cream. But overall,the Ford Fest did not strike me as a group of “scumbags, unintelligent, homophobic, and an embarrassment to Toronto”

It struck me as a valuable lesson in showing that the value of actually engaging the city and taking time for people is always a good place to start winning elections.

Agree or Disagree: Calgary’s New Taxi “Barf” Law


There is a new law in Calgary.

Calgary City Council has introduced a new law for those patrons that puke in a cab.

It will cost $100 if you happen to do this in a cab

Now, I am having issues posting on my IPad. So, I will be posting a link in the comments. 

However, I have some concerns

1) We are assuming everyone out late night is drunk

2) We are assuming that the reason people get sick is because they are drunk. You could be sick because of food poisoning for example

3)We are assuming the only people that use a cab service late at night is drunk people.

4) Who implements the fine?

I understand the cab companies,not needing to be on the hook. But am I the only one who thinks this isn’t thought out?

Agree or Disagree: The Podcast-Edmonton Sex Ed Controversy-Part 1 Click here http://www.spreaker.com/user/7021827/the-edmonton-sex-ed-controversy


 

This is Part 1 of our topic covering the controversy surrounding the Edmonton Pregnancy Care Centre and the Edmonton Public School Board.

Steven Britton and I interview Luke Fevin from the APUPIL ( Albertans Society for Unbiased Pupil Learning). He is also a member of the Edmonton Society of Atheists. SEA has been mentioned in the article of response from the Pregnancy Centre.

 

Topics include

-What is APUPIL?

-What specifically is the complaint and the context of it?

-Concerns around the Pregnancy Centre’s Content

-How should religion be handled in public schools?

-Pregnancy Centre response including a letter from a supporter

-Who is the Society of Edmonton Atheists?

-Is there a connection with SEA and Paula Simons and the Dawson Family?

-What should we be teaching kids in sex ed?

This is Part 1 of our conversation. We do hope to get a response from the Pregnancy Centre.

Follow Luke on Twitter

@According2Luke

Follow Edmonton Society of Atheists?

@EdmontonAtheist

Follow Steven

@scbritton

Follow me

@kevole

@AorDThePodcast

Add Kevin Olenick on Facebook

Like Agree or Disagree: The Podcast on Facebook 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agree or Disagree: Humanity is Sacred.


From time to time, I get requests on topics we should discuss on Agree or Disagree. This is one of those times.

This topic comes from Marty. He contributes from time to time. Him and I go back a few years. Actually, maybe more than a few years. He always provides humour and intelligence whenever he contributes.

He ask the question if Humanity is Sacred?

As a reminder from other guest posts, remember to keep on topic.Do not attack anyone personally, and of course we thank Marty for contributing.

 

Here are his thoughts for you to consider.

 

Is Humanity Sacred?

That’s the question…..

 

There are several reasons I’m curious about the varied perspectives that there must be on this topic.

We live in a society that heavily values personal freedoms and individual rights; those things are often described as “constitutional”. So in the human construct of government and “The people” we have determined that we are entitled to a basic standard of living. We also sometimes make those types of decisions for those who can’t speak for themselves (ie:animals, the environment etc.)

Often these decisions are made by representative groups or individuals whose position affords them the right to do so.That said, we acknowledge not all other species should by our laws.We have laws about theft, murder,ethics,standards of food production, where and it’s ok to be naked……and so on.But we have no trouble with the idea that other species do what they please so long as those decisions don’t adversely affect our lives.

In the end, decisions made about how we and (to a degree) other life forms live,form laws,how we eat, where we poop, when we sleep and what to do with our remains after we die made by humans.

So does that merely mean that we just happen to be the only ones in a position to do so? Or is Humanity somehow sacred? Since sacredness defined is “Connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose and so deserving veneration”, and our society is increasingly moving into the post-religious, what then, from the perspective of atheists and religious alike, does that mean for humanity?

If Human life is “Sacred”; why? And if it’s not “Sacred” ….what are we?

What makes human life so important?

 

Agree or Disagree:The Podcast-A preview of Upcoming Podcasts


http://www.spreaker.com/user/7021827/preview-of-upcoming-podcast-topics

A preview of upcoming Podcasts. Topics include

 

The Liknes/O’Brien case and the impacts going forward.

The Controversy between the Edmonton Public School Board and the Edmonton Pregnancy Care Centre.

How easy is it to date in Calgary?

An early look at the Mayoral Race in Toronto.

A new segment called Who’s Wins The Internet?
Follow @kevole
Follow @AorDThePodcast

Add Kevin Olenick on FB
Like Agree or Disagree:The Podcast on Facebook.

Agree or Disagree: Being in Love is not Enough


I think it is fair to say that we have all been in love.

Some of you still are in love. You met your Mr or Mrs Right and you are currently living your “happily ever after”.

But some of you were also in love. But,for whatever reason that is, it didn’t work out. Were you in love? Yes! Did you need more? Yes!

Mark Manson argues in this post that sometimes Love is not Enough.

http://markmanson.net/love

Do you Agree or Disagree?

Agree or Disagree: With more school choices, both taxpayers and students win.


There was an interesting perspective on this topic written in the Calgary Herald.

I’ll let you read it. It’s written by Mckenzie Hahn from Faith Beyond Belief.

She believes that more school options are beneficial for taxpayers and students.

You can read that here http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Hahn+Taxpayers+students+with+school+choice/10008477/story.html

Do you Agree or Disagree?

Agree or Disagree: CASL, new anti-spam law, punishes charities


http://beaconnews.ca/blog/2014/07/casl-new-anti-spam-law-punishes-charities/

It has been one week since the anti-spam CASL has been in effect.

Before the law was implemented,I went to a couple of information sessions on this. I can tell you from what I saw , there was a lot of confusion about CASL.

And there still is.

In the above column from Beacon News, Derrick James argues that this law is punishing charities.

I’ll let you read and then ask you what you think.